were read out and explained
I think when the Aquitations by the foreman were consistent, I mean that Regulative No. 2, page 18, was referred to, but I cannot say practically that it was.
I have been present at all the Medical Inspections since January 1, 1872. Every Surgeon on those occasions has been present. He was assisted by the Coroner Wardmaster of the Government Civil Hospital, except on one occasion when that office being vacant, a turnkey of the Gaol named James Follicis assisted - the late Colonial Surgeon being present. I should imagine James Follicis to be an unskilled practitioner.
On that occasion during our inspection, had any convict had anything to do with the suspicion?
I called the men on the 27th to attend the Superintendence. Brintly said, "You won't find any of us there." - did not attend in suspicion.
(Liqued) William J. Gair - Barrack Sergeant, March
were read out and explained
think
whan the Arquitations by the foftair keperinteistent. I Misch that Regulative No. 2. page 18. was referred to,
but I cannot say priticaly that it was. —
have
I lean been forecent at all the
Medical Suspectivores since January 1,872.
Que every
Surgeon
occasione the folercial or lieting fotonical
He was always
has been present. He was
afsisted by the Carropan Wardmaster ofthe
Government Civil Hospital, compt
au oue
vacant a
occasion - when that office bring turnkey of the Gaol named James follicis
afsisted - the late folonial Surgene being present _ I should imagine James follis to be au Ludivine Patiques
occasion
during
Ou
that time has any
40
convict
had anything to do with the suspection . _
I called the men on the 27th
272
Meacle to attend the Sempertine - auct Brinty
Said.
Slay
You won't.
Briarly
" find any of as there
- did not attend in suspection.
(Ligued) William J. Gair-
Barrack
Basrash Sergeant,
Mearch
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.